Technophobia is not the most significant patient-reported barrier to accepting a digital adherence package: an analysis of the MAGNIFY trial.

Andrew P Dickens, David M.G. Halpin, Victoria Carter, Derek Skinner, Kai M Beeh, James Chalmers, Allan Clark, Nasir Hannan, Alan Kaplan, Konstantinos Kostikas, Hilary Pinnock, Nicolas Roche, Omar Usmani, Job F.M. van Boven, Paul Mastoridis, Karen Mezzi, Franklin Igwe, Steve Davis, David Price

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction
COPD exacerbations lead to increased mortality and disease progression. Maintenance inhaled therapies can reduce exacerbation risk amongst COPD patients, but non-adherence reportedly ranges from 20-60% in this population. The ongoing cluster randomised trial (MAGNIFY) is investigating the use of digital adherence support as a solution to this problem, but there is little evidence regarding patients’ willingness to accept such devices.
Aims and objectives
To explore patient-reported barriers to accepting a technological adherence package.
Methods
COPD patients were screened for eligibility for the UK-based MAGNIFY trial (Price et al 2021 doi:10.2147/POR.S302809), with main inclusion criteria being aged 40 years or above, with ≥2 moderate/severe exacerbations in the last two years and with ≤50% adherence to mono/dual therapy. Eligible patients received a phone call from a pharmacist who conducted a remote patient review and
invited them to use the digital support package, comprising an Ultibro Breezhaler and adherence support technology (Propeller Health). Patients unwilling/unable to accept the package were asked to provide reasons.
Results
87 participating practices had a total COPD list size of 33211 patients, of which 1833 patients met the trial eligibility criteria. Pharmacists excluded 541 patients following electronic medical record review, and were unable to contact a further 111 patients. Of the 1181 patients contacted, 73 were clinically unsuitable for the adherence package. Of the remaining 1108 patients, 395 (36%) were
unwilling/unable to accept the adherence package; reasons included: no smartphone/incompatible phone (n=273), unwilling to change inhaler (n=71), unwilling to use the support package (n=19), life events (n=12), partially sighted (n=2), no reason (n=18). Patient demographics are reported in Table
1.
Conclusions
The main reasons for not accepting the adherence package were due to lacking a compatible smartphone or not wanting to change inhaler, rather than unwillingness to use technology. Though this is data from a single trial, the patients are from multiple diverse practices. The data suggest that technophobia may not be the most important barrier to patients accepting digital adherence support. A quarter of invited patients did not have a smartphone, highlighting the need for future implementation to ensure equitable access to digital support.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages5
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 14 Aug 2023
EventBritish Thoracic Society: Winter Meeting 2023 - QEII Centre in London, London, United Kingdom
Duration: 22 Nov 202324 Nov 2023
https://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/education-and-events/winter-meeting/

Conference

ConferenceBritish Thoracic Society
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityLondon
Period22/11/2324/11/23
Internet address

Bibliographical note

Funding
This study is funded by Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore. The MAGNIFY trial is part-funded by Novartis and OPRI.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Technophobia is not the most significant patient-reported barrier to accepting a digital adherence package: an analysis of the MAGNIFY trial.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this