The affinity between the rally and representative claim-making: evidence from Tanzania

Daniel Paget* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Studies analyse what politicians communicate at rallies. Yet most do so to determine what politicians communicate at large. Therefore, they implicitly assume that what they communicate at rallies is what they communicate across media. I ask: what is particular to the meanings that politicians, and indeed audience members, make at rallies? I theorise the rally as a media genre, in which those present are simplified into two entities (‘speakers’ and ‘audience’) and those entities engage in an asymmetric, interactive dialogue. I argue
that these two features of rally genre facilitate, but do not necessitate, the making of representative claims. I analyse ‘speaker’-‘audience’ discourse at rallies in Tanzania. I find that politicians use their speech to make representative claims and craft dialogues with ‘audiences’ which induce them to co-declare those claims. Therefore, I find that there is an affinity between the rally and representative claim-making.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)376-398
Number of pages23
JournalCommonwealth and Comparative Politics
Volume61
Issue number3
Early online date20 Aug 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2023

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgements
Thanks to the anonymous reviewers, journal editor Andrew Wyatt, and Gabrielle Lynch for their comments on earlier drafts, which improved the paper considerably. Thanks to my research assistants, who which to remain anonymous. Thanks to everyone in Tanzania who made this research possible through their hospitality, assistance, participation, insight and/or kindness.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The affinity between the rally and representative claim-making: evidence from Tanzania'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this