The assessment of culpability and harm in applying the Scottish Sentencing Council's guideline on Sentencing Young People: the decision in Dunn v HM Advocate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Discusses the court's observations on the use of the Scottish Sentencing Council's Sentencing Young People guideline in Dunn (James) v HM Advocate (HCJ), focusing on the correct approach towards assessing the seriousness of an offence committed by a young person, taking into account levels of culpability and harm.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalGreens Criminal Law Bulletin
Issue number186
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The assessment of culpability and harm in applying the Scottish Sentencing Council's guideline on Sentencing Young People: the decision in Dunn v HM Advocate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this