The global subject of precarity

Ritu Vij* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)


This article explores the universalizing logic of precarity and precariousness in global studies discourse. Originally articulated in the work of Guy Standing and Judith Butler, this logic presupposes a possibility for a global politics of equality between precarious subjects in the North and South based on an emergent shared horizon of suffering. In a close reading of Standing and Butler, I challenge claims about equivalence by calling attention to the liberal analytics that inform their work. Drawing on a postcolonial attunement to historically constituted exclusions, I argue that precarity is better understood as a dis-ordering experience of sovereign subjectivity whose principal referent is the liberal not global subject of precarity. Globalizing the liberal subject of precarity entails the recuperation of its constitutive outside, namely the Third World, as the original site of abjection. The de-politicizing implications of attempts to universalize the subject of precarity are briefly outlined in conclusion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)506-524
Number of pages19
Issue number4
Early online date17 Apr 2019
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019


  • Precarity
  • globalization
  • liberal subject
  • Judith Butler
  • abjection
  • precariat


Dive into the research topics of 'The global subject of precarity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this