The role of geoarchaeology in the interpretation of fragmented buildings and occupation surfaces: The case of coastal settlements in northeast Scotland

Vanessa Reid* (Corresponding Author), Karen Milek, Charlotte O'Brien, Óskar G. Sveinbjarnarson, Gordon Noble

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Around the world, poorly preserved buildings and occupation deposits often represent the primary evidence for archaeological structures and settlements. Integrated geoarchaeological methods, such as soil chemistry and micromorphology, can be used to maximise the information obtained from such deposits regarding site preservation and the use of space. However, archaeologists are often reluctant to apply these methods if they suspect that preservation is poor or stratigraphy is not visible in the field. To assess the role that geoarchaeology can play in the interpretation of fragmented and poorly preserved structures, this paper presents the results of two case studies in which multiple geoarchaeological methods (microrefuse analysis, pH, electrical conductivity, magnetic susceptibility, loss-on-ignition, portable XRF and micromorphology) were applied to poorly preserved occupation deposits and fragmented buildings in early medieval coastal settlements in northeast Scotland. Micromorphology proved to be fundamental for recognising and understanding the composition of occupation deposits that had formerly been floor surfaces. It also aided interpretations for the use of space and maintenance practices and improved an understanding of the post-depositional processes that had affected stratigraphic visibility at the macroscale. When subjected to principal component analysis, the geochemical, magnetic and microrefuse data were able to provide new details about activity areas, and successfully identified and filtered out the effects of post-medieval contamination. Most significantly, the integrated approach demonstrates that fragmented buildings and poorly preserved occupation surfaces can retain surviving characteristics of the use of space, even if the floor surfaces were not preserved well enough to be clearly defined in the field or in thin section.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)238-267
Number of pages30
JournalGeoarchaeology-An International Journal
Volume39
Issue number3
Early online date28 Dec 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Dec 2023

Bibliographical note

Our gratitude is extended to all those who participated in the excavations, in particular the volunteers who aided in the collection of bulk samples for geoarchaeological analysis. The authors also extend thanks to George MacLeod at the University of Stirling for producing the thin sections and providing technical support during pXRF analysis, and to four anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. The 2016 excavation season at Burghead was funded by the University of Aberdeen Development Trust. The 2016 excavation season at Dunnicaer was funded by the University of Aberdeen Development Trust, Aberdeenshire Council Archaeology Service and the Strathmartine Trust. The geoarchaeological research was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council as part of the IAPETUS Doctorial Training Programme (grant number NE/L002590/1), and Karen Milek's contribution was supported by the Leverhulme Trust (grant RPG-2019-258).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.

Keywords

  • geoarchaeology
  • micromorphology
  • preservation
  • settlement
  • site formation processes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of geoarchaeology in the interpretation of fragmented buildings and occupation surfaces: The case of coastal settlements in northeast Scotland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this