To better appraise (un)certainty in systematic reviews, useful approaches exist. A comment on Moore et al.

Patrice Forget^* (Corresponding Author)

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1179-1180
Number of pages	2
Journal	European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom)
Volume	26
Issue number	5
Early online date	13 Mar 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1929
Publication status	Published - 1 May 2022

Access to Document

@article{e11f26d023e24ee9b392a35ddb29bbf8,

title = "To better appraise (un)certainty in systematic reviews, useful approaches exist. A comment on Moore et al.",

author = "Patrice Forget",

year = "2022",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/ejp.1929",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "1179--1180",

journal = "European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom)",

issn = "1090-3801",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell ",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - To better appraise (un)certainty in systematic reviews, useful approaches exist. A comment on Moore et al.

AU - Forget, Patrice

PY - 2022/5/1

Y1 - 2022/5/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126101570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ejp.1929

DO - 10.1002/ejp.1929

M3 - Letter

C2 - 35263488

AN - SCOPUS:85126101570

SN - 1090-3801

VL - 26

SP - 1179

EP - 1180

JO - European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom)

JF - European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom)

IS - 5

ER -