When did this happen?: Indicators of accuracy for dating recent and remote personal events

Aleš  Neusar; Eva Rubínová

doi:10.1037/mac0000065

When did this happen? Indicators of accuracy for dating recent and remote personal events

Aleš Neusar, Eva Rubínová^* (Corresponding Author)

^*Corresponding author for this work

Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Memory for time is often imperfect. We investigated indicators of dating accuracy for recent and remote personal events. In Study 1, 78 participants dated approximately 20 events from the past three to eleven weeks, and in Study 2, 40 participants dated approximately 25 events three to five years old. For date verification, events were obtained from participants’ partners, who kept a diary (Study 1) or retrieved events from personal records (Study 2). In both studies, we found that confidence, dating strategy indicating known dates, and a direct
connection with temporal landmarks were associated with higher dating accuracy. High importance, direct experience, and events embedded within extended periods indicated higher dating accuracy for recent events; high vividness was associated with higher dating accuracy for remote events. Our results suggest that confidence, dating strategy, and phenomenological
characteristics can provide useful indication of dating accuracy

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	290-304
Number of pages	15
Journal	Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Volume	12
Issue number	2
Early online date	8 Sept 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000065
Publication status	Published - Jun 2023

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Gabriela Jiskrová, Albert Kšiňan and Josef Kundrát
for their help with data collection, Vojtěch Zajíček for his help with inter-rater coding, and all participants and their proxies who took part in this research for their time.

Data Availability Statement

All data will be made publicly available at the Open Science Framework
upon publication and can be accessed at https://osf.io/u594x/.

Keywords

autobiographical memory
dating accuracy
temporal schema
temporal landmark
confidence-accuracy

Access to Document

10.1037/mac0000065Licence: Unspecified

Neusar_etal_JARMC_When_Did_This_AAM
©American Psychological Association, 2022. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000065
Accepted author manuscript, 1.04 MBLicence: Other

When did this happen? Indicators of accuracy for dating recent and remote personal events
Neusar, A. (Contributor) & Rubinova, E. (Creator), University of Aberdeen, 4 Aug 2022
https://osf.io/u594x/
Dataset

Cite this

@article{11a3264897e749cfaeff92101461d02e,

title = "When did this happen?: Indicators of accuracy for dating recent and remote personal events",

abstract = "Memory for time is often imperfect. We investigated indicators of dating accuracy for recent and remote personal events. In Study 1, 78 participants dated approximately 20 events from the past three to eleven weeks, and in Study 2, 40 participants dated approximately 25 events three to five years old. For date verification, events were obtained from participants{\textquoteright} partners, who kept a diary (Study 1) or retrieved events from personal records (Study 2). In both studies, we found that confidence, dating strategy indicating known dates, and a directconnection with temporal landmarks were associated with higher dating accuracy. High importance, direct experience, and events embedded within extended periods indicated higher dating accuracy for recent events; high vividness was associated with higher dating accuracy for remote events. Our results suggest that confidence, dating strategy, and phenomenologicalcharacteristics can provide useful indication of dating accuracy",

keywords = "autobiographical memory, dating accuracy, temporal schema, temporal landmark, confidence-accuracy",

author = "Ale{\v s} Neusar and Eva Rub{\'i}nov{\'a}",

note = "Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Gabriela Jiskrov{\'a}, Albert K{\v s}i{\v n}an and Josef Kundr{\'a}t for their help with data collection, Vojt{\v e}ch Zaj{\'i}{\v c}ek for his help with inter-rater coding, and all participants and their proxies who took part in this research for their time.",

year = "2023",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1037/mac0000065",

language = "English",

volume = "12",

pages = "290--304",

journal = "Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition",

issn = "2211-3681",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When did this happen?

T2 - Indicators of accuracy for dating recent and remote personal events

AU - Neusar, Aleš

AU - Rubínová, Eva

N1 - Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Gabriela Jiskrová, Albert Kšiňan and Josef Kundrát for their help with data collection, Vojtěch Zajíček for his help with inter-rater coding, and all participants and their proxies who took part in this research for their time.

PY - 2023/6

Y1 - 2023/6

N2 - Memory for time is often imperfect. We investigated indicators of dating accuracy for recent and remote personal events. In Study 1, 78 participants dated approximately 20 events from the past three to eleven weeks, and in Study 2, 40 participants dated approximately 25 events three to five years old. For date verification, events were obtained from participants’ partners, who kept a diary (Study 1) or retrieved events from personal records (Study 2). In both studies, we found that confidence, dating strategy indicating known dates, and a directconnection with temporal landmarks were associated with higher dating accuracy. High importance, direct experience, and events embedded within extended periods indicated higher dating accuracy for recent events; high vividness was associated with higher dating accuracy for remote events. Our results suggest that confidence, dating strategy, and phenomenologicalcharacteristics can provide useful indication of dating accuracy

AB - Memory for time is often imperfect. We investigated indicators of dating accuracy for recent and remote personal events. In Study 1, 78 participants dated approximately 20 events from the past three to eleven weeks, and in Study 2, 40 participants dated approximately 25 events three to five years old. For date verification, events were obtained from participants’ partners, who kept a diary (Study 1) or retrieved events from personal records (Study 2). In both studies, we found that confidence, dating strategy indicating known dates, and a directconnection with temporal landmarks were associated with higher dating accuracy. High importance, direct experience, and events embedded within extended periods indicated higher dating accuracy for recent events; high vividness was associated with higher dating accuracy for remote events. Our results suggest that confidence, dating strategy, and phenomenologicalcharacteristics can provide useful indication of dating accuracy

KW - autobiographical memory

KW - dating accuracy

KW - temporal schema

KW - temporal landmark

KW - confidence-accuracy

U2 - 10.1037/mac0000065

DO - 10.1037/mac0000065

M3 - Article

SN - 2211-3681

VL - 12

SP - 290

EP - 304

JO - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

IS - 2

ER -

When did this happen? Indicators of accuracy for dating recent and remote personal events

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Data Availability Statement

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Datasets

When did this happen? Indicators of accuracy for dating recent and remote personal events

Cite this