Assessment of Cardiac Energy Metabolism, Function, and Physiology in Patients With Heart Failure Taking Empagliflozin: The Randomized, Controlled EMPA-VISION Trial

Moritz J Hundertmark, Amanda Adler, Charalambos Antoniades, Ruth Coleman, Julian L Griffin, Rury R Holman, Hanan Lamlum, Jisoo Lee, Daniel Massey, Jack J J J Miller, Joanne E Milton, Shveta Monga, Ferenc E Mózes, Areesha Nazeer, Betty Raman, Oliver Rider, Christopher T Rodgers, Ladislav Valkovič, Eleanor Wicks, Masliza MahmodStefan Neubauer* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have emerged as a paramount treatment for patients with heart failure (HF), irrespective of underlying reduced or preserved ejection fraction. However, a definite cardiac mechanism of action remains elusive. Derangements in myocardial energy metabolism are detectable in all HF phenotypes, and it was proposed that SGLT2i may improve energy production. The authors aimed to investigate whether treatment with empagliflozin leads to changes in myocardial energetics, serum metabolomics, and cardiorespiratory fitness.

METHODS: EMPA-VISION is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, mechanistic trial that enrolled 72 symptomatic patients with chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; n=36; left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%; New York Heart Association class ≥II; NT-proBNP [N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide] ≥125 pg/mL) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; n=36; left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%; New York Heart Association class ≥II; NT-proBNP ≥125 pg/mL). Patients were stratified into respective cohorts (HFrEF versus HFpEF) and randomly assigned to empagliflozin (10 mg; n=35: 17 HFrEF and 18 HFpEF) or placebo (n=37: 19 HFrEF and 18 HFpEF) once daily for 12 weeks. The primary end point was a change in the cardiac phosphocreatine:ATP ratio (PCr:ATP) from baseline to week 12, determined by phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy at rest and during peak dobutamine stress (65% of age-maximum heart rate). Mass spectrometry on a targeted set of 19 metabolites was performed at baseline and after treatment. Other exploratory end points were investigated.

RESULTS: Empagliflozin treatment did not change cardiac energetics (ie, PCr:ATP) at rest in HFrEF (adjusted mean treatment difference [empagliflozin - placebo], -0.25 [95% CI, -0.58 to 0.09]; P=0.14) or HFpEF (adjusted mean treatment difference, -0.16 [95% CI, -0.60 to 0.29]; P=0.47]. Likewise, there were no changes in PCr:ATP during dobutamine stress in HFrEF (adjusted mean treatment difference, -0.13 [95% CI, -0.35 to 0.09]; P=0.23) or HFpEF (adjusted mean treatment difference, -0.22 [95% CI, -0.66 to 0.23]; P=0.32). No changes in serum metabolomics or levels of circulating ketone bodies were observed.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with either HFrEF or HFpEF, treatment with 10 mg of empagliflozin once daily for 12 weeks did not improve cardiac energetics or change circulating serum metabolites associated with energy metabolism when compared with placebo. Based on our results, it is unlikely that enhancing cardiac energy metabolism mediates the beneficial effects of SGLT2i in HF.

REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03332212.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1654-1669
Number of pages15
JournalCirculation
Volume147
Issue number22
Early online date18 Apr 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 May 2023

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgments
The authors express their gratitude toward the Oxford cardiovascular magnetic resonance nursing team, specifically Judith DeLos Santos, Catherine Krasopoulos, Marion Galley, and Claudia Nunes; and the diabetes trials unit team, particularly Irene Kennedy, for her organization skills. The authors also thank the team of the computed tomography suite at the Manor Hospital Oxford as well as all patients who participated in this trial. Drs Holman and Neubauer are Emeritus National Institute for Health Research senior investigators. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, National Institute for Health and Care Research, or Department of Health.

Sources of Funding
Boehringer Ingelheim is the sponsor of the EMPA-VISION study and was involved in early stages of its study design. Boehringer Ingelheim employees (Drs Lee and Massey) also supported preparation of this manuscript. Dr Neubauer acknowledges support from the Oxford British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence. Drs Holman and Neubauer were supported by the Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre. Drs Rodgers and Valkovič are funded by Sir Henry Dale Fellowships from the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society [098436/Z/12/B and 221805/Z/20/Z, respectively]. Dr Valkovič also gratefully acknowledges support of the Slovak Grant Agencies VEGA (Vedecká grantová agentúra) [2/0003/20] and APVV (Slovak Research and Development Agency) [No. 19–0032]. Dr Miller acknowledges support from the Novo Foundation (NNF21OC0068683).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of Cardiac Energy Metabolism, Function, and Physiology in Patients With Heart Failure Taking Empagliflozin: The Randomized, Controlled EMPA-VISION Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this