Definitions of progression in chronic kidney disease-predictors and relationship to renal replacement therapy in a population cohort with a 6 year follow-up

Angharad Marks*, Nicholas Fluck, Gordon J. Prescott, Lynn Marie Robertson, William G. Simpson, William Cairns S. Smith, Corri Black

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)
13 Downloads (Pure)


Background. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common, important and associated with increased healthcare needs due to CKD progression. Definitions of renal disease progression are multiple, and not always comparable. A measure of 'progression' directly comparable with renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation would identify 'progressors' in research and for healthcare planning.

Methods. The Grampian Laboratory Outcomes Morbidity and Mortality Study (GLOMMS-I) is a community cohort with CKD from 2003, followed up to June 2009 for (i) RRT initiation and (ii) 'progression': sustained reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by 15 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (equivalent to CKD stage change), or to <10 mL/min/1.73 m(2), whichever occurs first. Predictors were baseline demographics and comorbidity. The use of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes-2012 progression definition was also explored.

Results. Two thousand two hundred and eighty-nine and 1044 had Stage 3 and 4 CKD, 44% were males. Overall, RRT initiation and progression rates were 0.97 and 3.50 per 100 patient-years (py). Females had significantly lower progression and RRT initiation rates. The progression rate was not dependent on CKD stage [incidence rate ratio (IRR) for Stage 4 (versus Stage 3) 0.9 (95% CI 0.8-1.2)], whereas the RRT initiation rate was [IRR 5.6 (95% CI 3.8-8.2)]. Increased proteinuria was associated with both greater RRT initiation and progression rates.

Conclusions. Progression and RRT initiation rate ratios allow comparison of predictors of these outcomes. Higher rates of both in males suggest that greater RRT initiation rate is biological rather than due to preferential treatment. Similar progression but very different RRT initiation rates in Stage 3 and 4 CKD suggests that CKD stage effect on RRT initiation is a function of endpoint proximity rather than faster renal function deterioration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-341
Number of pages9
JournalNephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Issue number2
Early online date29 Sept 2013
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014


  • chronic kidney disease
  • cohort
  • progression
  • renal replacement therapy
  • risk-factors
  • CKD
  • epidemiology
  • outcomes
  • decline
  • cost
  • care
  • GFR
  • Glomerular Filtration Rate
  • renal insufficiency, chronic


Dive into the research topics of 'Definitions of progression in chronic kidney disease-predictors and relationship to renal replacement therapy in a population cohort with a 6 year follow-up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this