Interpersonal comparison, status and ambition in organizations

Florian Ederer, Andrea Patacconi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)


This paper shows that introducing status concerns into a tournament model has substantial implications for the provision of incentives. We emphasize the role of reference groups and determine the optimal number of winners and losers in tournaments. To compensate employees for the disutility of low status, a profit-maximizing employer may be reluctant to demote employees and instead reward workers through promotions. This rationalizes the prevalence of compensation systems which reward winners without explicitly identifying losers. Differences in ambition and ability affect contestants’ efforts and may result in inefficient promotion outcomes. We analyze how to mitigate these inefficiencies when managing a diverse workforce by using mixed and segregated tournaments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)348-363
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Issue number2
Early online date31 Mar 2010
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010


  • reference-dependent preferences
  • status
  • ambition
  • tournaments


Dive into the research topics of 'Interpersonal comparison, status and ambition in organizations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this