The Circle Squared? Floating Charges and Diligence After MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd.

Alisdair Macpherson

The Circle Squared? Floating Charges and Diligence After MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Discusses MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd (In Receivership and Liquidation) (IH) on whether an inhibition was "effectively executed diligence" that conferred priority over a floating charge holder. Considers remaining issues about the relationship of diligence, floating charges and insolvency.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	230-249
Number of pages	20
Journal	Juridical Review
Issue number	4
Publication status	Published - Dec 2018

Bibliographical note

Available through Westlaw UK.

Keywords

diligence
floating charges
inhibitions
preferences
receivers
Scotland

Access to Document

Accepted Manuscript
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Juridical Review following peer review. The definitive published version Macpherson, A 2018, 'The Circle Squared? Floating Charges and Diligence After MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd' Juridical Review, no. 4, pp. 230-249., is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Accepted author manuscript, 321 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

Alisdair Macpherson
- School of Law, Law - Senior Lecturer
- Engineering, National Decommissioning Centre
- School of Law, Centre for Scots Law
- School of Law, Centre for Commercial Law
- School of Law, Centre for Energy Law
Person: Academic

Cite this

@article{fb0c93b36fb144b99e1023486981dd08,

title = "The Circle Squared? Floating Charges and Diligence After MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd.",

abstract = "Discusses MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd (In Receivership and Liquidation) (IH) on whether an inhibition was {"}effectively executed diligence{"} that conferred priority over a floating charge holder. Considers remaining issues about the relationship of diligence, floating charges and insolvency.",

keywords = "diligence, floating charges, inhibitions, preferences, receivers, Scotland",

author = "Alisdair Macpherson",

note = "Available through Westlaw UK.",

year = "2018",

month = dec,

language = "English",

pages = "230--249",

journal = "Juridical Review",

issn = "0022-6785",

publisher = "W. Green & sons",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Circle Squared? Floating Charges and Diligence After MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd.

AU - Macpherson, Alisdair

N1 - Available through Westlaw UK.

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - Discusses MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd (In Receivership and Liquidation) (IH) on whether an inhibition was "effectively executed diligence" that conferred priority over a floating charge holder. Considers remaining issues about the relationship of diligence, floating charges and insolvency.

AB - Discusses MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd (In Receivership and Liquidation) (IH) on whether an inhibition was "effectively executed diligence" that conferred priority over a floating charge holder. Considers remaining issues about the relationship of diligence, floating charges and insolvency.

KW - diligence

KW - floating charges

KW - inhibitions

KW - preferences

KW - receivers

KW - Scotland

M3 - Article

SN - 0022-6785

SP - 230

EP - 249

JO - Juridical Review

JF - Juridical Review

IS - 4

ER -

The Circle Squared? Floating Charges and Diligence After MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd.

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Profiles

Alisdair Macpherson

Cite this