The Circle Squared? Floating Charges and Diligence After MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd.

Alisdair Macpherson

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Discusses MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd (In Receivership and Liquidation) (IH) on whether an inhibition was "effectively executed diligence" that conferred priority over a floating charge holder. Considers remaining issues about the relationship of diligence, floating charges and insolvency.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)230-249
Number of pages20
JournalJuridical Review
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Bibliographical note

Available through Westlaw UK.

Keywords

  • diligence
  • floating charges
  • inhibitions
  • preferences
  • receivers
  • Scotland

Access to Document

  • Accepted Manuscript

    This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Juridical Review following peer review. The definitive published version Macpherson, A 2018, 'The Circle Squared? Floating Charges and Diligence After MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd' Juridical Review, no. 4, pp. 230-249., is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

    Accepted author manuscript, 321 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

    Cite this