Abstract
The aim of the present paper to analyse the reasoning behind the landmark constitutional decisions delivered by the UK Supreme Court (UKSR) and its predecessor, the House of Lords (UKHL, from 1948, the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords), between 1876 and 2012.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Comparative Constitutional Reasoning |
| Editors | András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre, Giulio Itzcovich |
| Place of Publication | Cambridge |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Pages | 679-722 |
| Number of pages | 44 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781108139090 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781107085589 , 9781107449763 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2017 |
Datasets
-
Judicial individualism and judicial disagreement in constitutional reasoning
Gyorfi, T. (Creator) & Boda-Balogh, E. (Creator), Mendeley Data, 29 Jul 2020
DOI: 10.17632/cg6fjg75vx.1, https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/cg6fjg75vx
Dataset
Profiles
-
Tamas Gyorfi
- School of Law, Law - Personal Chair
- School of Law, Centre for Constitutional and Public International Law
Person: Academic