Validation of positional candidates Rps6ka6 and Pou3f4 for a locus associated with skeletal muscle mass variability

Konstantinos Lekkos, Afra A Bhuiyan, Abdullah Mohammed Albloshi, Paige M Brooks, Thomas M Coate, Arimantas Lionikas* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Genetic variability significantly contributes to individual differences in skeletal muscle mass; however, the specific genes involved in that process remain elusive. In this study, we examined the role of positional candidates, Rps6ka6 and Pou3f4, of a chromosome X locus, implicated in muscle mass variability in CFW laboratory mice. Histology of hindlimb muscles was studied in CFW male mice carrying the muscle “increasing” allele C (n = 15) or “decreasing” allele T (n = 15) at the peak marker of the locus, rs31308852, and in the Pou3f4y/− and their wild-type male littermates. To study the role of the Rps6ka6 gene, we deleted exon 7 (Rps6ka6-ΔE7) using clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats-Cas9 based method in H2Kb myogenic cells creating a severely truncated RSK4 protein. We then tested whether that mutation affected myoblast proliferation, migration, and/or differentiation. The extensor digitorum longus muscle was 7% larger (P < 0.0001) due to 10% more muscle fibers (P = 0.0176) in the carriers of the “increasing” compared with the “decreasing” CFW allele. The number of fibers was reduced by 15% (P = 0.0268) in the slow-twitch soleus but not in the fast-twitch extensor digitorum longus (P = 0.2947) of Pou3f4y/− mice. The proliferation and migration did not differ between the Rps6ka6-ΔE7 and wild-type H2Kb myoblasts. However, indices of differentiation (myosin expression, P < 0.0001; size of myosin-expressing cells, P < 0.0001; and fusion index, P = 0.0013) were significantly reduced in Rps6ka6-ΔE7 cells. This study suggests that the effect of the X chromosome locus on muscle fiber numbers in the fast-twitch extensor digitorum longus is mediated by the Rps6ka6 gene, whereas the Pou3f4 gene affects fiber number in slow-twitch soleus.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberjkae046
JournalG3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics Mission
Volume14
Issue number5
Early online date5 Apr 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 May 2024

Bibliographical note

Open Acess via the OUP Agreement
Acknowledgments
Authors are grateful for Mr James Archibald for assistance with histological analysis of muscle samples and for the Microscopy and Histology Core Facility at the University of Aberdeen for the help with imaging.
Funding
A.L. was supported by awards AR052879 and AR056280 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, award 249156 from the FP7-PEOPLE-2009-RG programme, award CGA/18/05 from the Chief Scientist Office, award 21/019 from the NHS Grampian, and award 204815/Z/16/Z from the Wellcome Trust. T.M.C. was supported by NIH R01 DC016595. P.M.B. was supported by NIH R01 DC016595, NIH F31 DC019824, and TL1TR001431. Research reported in this article was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under award number TL1TR001431. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Data Availability Statement

The H2Kb cell clones are available upon request. The authors affirm that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions of the article are present within the article, figures, and tables.

Supplemental material available at G3 online.

Keywords

  • RSK4
  • myogenesis
  • muscle fibers
  • Cell Movement/genetics
  • Cell Proliferation
  • Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 90-kDa/genetics
  • Male
  • Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism
  • Genetic Loci
  • Myoblasts/metabolism
  • Animals
  • Alleles
  • Cell Differentiation/genetics
  • Mice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of positional candidates Rps6ka6 and Pou3f4 for a locus associated with skeletal muscle mass variability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this